Usage Score
19.9
Player Dossier
2013-2016Wisconsin
Robert Wheelwright
WR • 6'3" • Columbus, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Robert Wheelwright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.4
Consistency
63
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Robert Wheelwright, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin. Robert Wheelwright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 416 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
37.3
Efficiency
79.4
Usage
19.9
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 12. LSU: 60. Akron: 99. Georgia State: 35. Michigan State: 34. Michigan: 46. Ohio State: 36. Nebraska: 43. Northwestern: 28. Illinois: 11. Purdue: 25. Minnesota: 19
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 1 by 80. LSU: 4 by 100. Akron: 4 by 100. Georgia State: 4 by 58.3. Michigan State: 3 by 75.6. Michigan: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 100. Nebraska: 5 by 57.3. Northwestern: 3 by 62.2. Illinois: 1 by 73.3. Purdue: 2 by 83.3. Minnesota: 2 by 63.3
Split Comparison
Wins36.6 · n=10 · -4.4 vs Losses
Losses41 · n=2 · +4.4 vs Wins
First Half47.7 · n=6 · +20.7 vs Second Half
Second Half27 · n=6 · -20.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs Western Michigan | W 24-16 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Purdue | W 49-20 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Illinois | W 48-3 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Northwestern | W 21-7 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Nebraska | W 23-17 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.2 | 8.60 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Ohio State | L 23-30 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Michigan | L 7-14 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Michigan State | W 30-6 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Georgia State | W 23-17 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Akron | W 54-10 | — | 4 | 99 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs LSU | W 16-14 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 9 | 30 | 6.3 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 17 | 100 | 9.1 | 8 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 416 | 81.1 | 17.9 | 399 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 416 | 81.1 | 17.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 448 | 79.4 | 19.9 | 32 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 448 | 79.4 | 19.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Akron
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Miami (OH)
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 87.8 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
LSU
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
416 primary output · 81.1 efficiency · 17.9 usage
67.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
67.3
416 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 17.9 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
65.6
448 primary · 79.4 efficiency · 19.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8885
Walnut Ridge · Columbus, OH
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
890
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.