Usage Score
26.7
Player Dossier
2013-2017Wisconsin
Troy Fumagalli
TE • 6'6" • 248 lbs • Aurora, IL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Troy Fumagalli reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.1
Consistency
53.8
Season Value
63.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
131414151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Troy Fumagalli, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin. Troy Fumagalli reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 580 primary output with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.6
Efficiency
72.1
Usage
26.7
Consistency
53.8
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 31. Utah State: 105. Florida Atlantic: 92. BYU: 39. Nebraska: 31. Maryland: 83. Illinois: 31. Indiana: 20. Iowa: 21. Michigan: 38. Minnesota: 11. Ohio State: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 3 by 68.9. Utah State: 5 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 8 by 76.7. BYU: 2 by 100. Nebraska: 3 by 68.9. Maryland: 7 by 79. Illinois: 2 by 100. Indiana: 3 by 44.4. Iowa: 3 by 46.7. Michigan: 3 by 84.4. Minnesota: 2 by 36.7. Ohio State: 5 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins45.6 · n=11
First Half63.5 · n=6 · +35.8 vs Second Half
Second Half27.7 · n=6 · -35.8 vs First Half
All Games45.6 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/31 | @ Miami | W 34-24 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 12/3 | vs Ohio State | L 21-27 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Minnesota | W 31-0 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Michigan | W 24-10 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Iowa | W 38-14 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Indiana | W 45-17 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Illinois | W 24-10 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Maryland | W 38-13 | — | 7 | 83 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Nebraska | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ BYU | W 40-6 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Florida AtlanticHigh volume | W 31-14 | — | 8 | 92 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Utah State100 receiving yards | W 59-10 | — | 5 | 105 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 44 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 187 | 78.3 | 9.7 | 187 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 187 | 78.3 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 313 | 67.4 | 15.3 | 126 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 313 | 67.4 | 15.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 580 | 76 | 24.7 | 267 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 580 | 76 | 24.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wisconsin | 547 | 72.1 | 26.7 | -33 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 547 | 72.1 | 26.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 95.2 efficiency score.
#3
Western Michigan
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
580 primary output · 76 efficiency · 24.7 usage
66.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Wisconsin
66.3
580 primary · 76 efficiency · 24.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Wisconsin
63.2
547 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 26.7 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8233
Waubonsie Valley · Aurora, IL
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,627
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.