Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2016Wisconsin
RB • 5'11" • Glassboro, NJ, USA
Corey Clement leans workhorse runner traits and 47.2 efficiency.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Impact Production
94
Top-tier box-score impact for a back
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
73
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Player Story
Corey Clement built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a running back from Glassboro, NJ wearing No. 6, spending time with Wisconsin. The clearest part of Corey Clement's career was his backfield work:...
Read the storyCorey Clement, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin. Corey Clement leans workhorse runner traits and 47.2 efficiency.
Stat Footprint

Featured Highlight
Corey Clement Wisconsin Highlights
2016 · Wisconsin · Player Highlight
Corey Clement college highlights at Wisconsin.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 8 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 52 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 8 | 524 | 515 | 9 | 7 | 52 |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 14 | 116 | 105 | 11 | 1 | 62.1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 14 | 952 | 844 | 108 | 10 | 62.1 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 4 | 66 | 66 | 0 | 1 | 46.9 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 4 | 174 | 155 | 19 | 4 | 46.9 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 13 | 99 | 71 | 28 | 1 | 80.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 13 | 1,408 | 1,304 | 104 | 14 | 80.8 |
Related Context
Corey Clement played RB for Wisconsin. Across 4 tracked seasons, Corey Clement recorded 3,092 rushing yards, 279 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Wisconsin.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 1,507 primary output with 47.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
115.9
Efficiency
47.2
Usage
41.4
Consistency
76.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 99. LSU: 86. Akron: 111. Michigan State: 51. Michigan: 68. Ohio State: 182. Iowa: 145. Nebraska: 82. Northwestern: 117. Illinois: 147. Purdue: 112. Minnesota: 100. Penn State: 207
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 24 by 37.4. LSU: 21 by 42.7. Akron: 21 by 55.1. Michigan State: 24 by 23.5. Michigan: 17 by 41.7. Ohio State: 26 by 70.2. Iowa: 37 by 40.3. Nebraska: 19 by 45. Northwestern: 34 by 35. Illinois: 26 by 54.3. Purdue: 27 by 43.2. Minnesota: 26 by 40.1. Penn State: 24 by 84.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
84.7 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs Western Michigan | W 24-16 | 22 | 71 | 3.20 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 4.1 |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Penn State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 31-38 | 21 | 164 | 7.80 | 1 | 3 | 43 | 8.6 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Minnesota100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 31-17 | 26 | 100 | 3.80 | 2 | — | — | 3.8 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Purdue100 rush yards | W 49-20 | 27 | 112 | 4.10 | 1 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Illinois100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 48-3 | 25 | 123 | 4.90 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 5.7 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Northwestern100 rush yards | W 21-7 | 32 | 106 | 3.30 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Nebraska | W 23-17 | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Iowa100 rush yards | W 17-9 | 35 | 134 | 3.80 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 3.9 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Ohio State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 23-30 | 25 | 164 | 6.60 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Michigan | L 7-14 | 17 | 68 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Michigan State2+ TD | W 30-6 | 23 | 54 | 2.30 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 2.1 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Akron100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 54-10 | 21 | 111 | 5.30 | 2 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs LSU | W 16-14 | 21 | 86 | 4.10 | 1 | — | — | 4.1 |
Player Story
Corey Clement built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a running back from Glassboro, NJ wearing No. 6, spending time with Wisconsin. The clearest part of Corey Clement's career was his backfield work: 3,092 rushing yards, 576 carries, 36 rushing touchdowns, and 279 receiving yards across 39 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Wisconsin. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 279 receiving yards, 1 tackle, and 32 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 39 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Wisconsin.
The arc is straightforward: Corey Clement moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 556 | 70 | 14.1 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 556 | 70 | 14.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,068 | 56.9 | 19.6 | 512 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,068 | 56.9 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 240 | 45.5 | 23.7 | -828 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 240 | 45.5 | 23.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,507 | 47.2 | 41.4 | 1,267 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,507 | 47.2 | 41.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Penn State
Week 14 · L 31-38 · Conference game
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
207
Scrimmage Yards
94.9 takeover
207 scrimmage yards and 36.9 usage.
#2
vs Illinois
Week 7 · W 38-28 · Conference game
164
Scrimmage Yards
89.6 takeover
Win with 164 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
164 scrimmage yards and 24.1 usage.
#3
vs Ohio State
Week 7 · L 23-30 · Conference game
182
Scrimmage Yards
86 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
182 scrimmage yards and 41.9 usage.
#4
vs Rutgers
Week 9 · W 48-10 · Conference game
115
Scrimmage Yards
85.1 takeover
Win with 115 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
115 scrimmage yards and 21.6 usage.
#5
@ Rutgers
Week 10 · W 37-0 · Conference game
137
Scrimmage Yards
83.7 takeover
Win with 137 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
137 scrimmage yards and 27.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
1,507 primary output · 47.2 efficiency · 41.4 usage
80.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Wisconsin
80.8
1,507 primary · 47.2 efficiency · 41.4 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Wisconsin
62.1
1,068 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 19.6 usage
16
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.