Usage Score
41.4
Player Dossier
2013-2016Wisconsin
Corey Clement
RB • 5'11" • Glassboro, NJ, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Corey Clement leans workhorse runner traits and 47.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
47.2
Consistency
76.1
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
1313141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Clement, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin. Corey Clement leans workhorse runner traits and 47.2 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 1,507 primary output with 47.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
115.9
Efficiency
47.2
Usage
41.4
Consistency
76.1
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 99. LSU: 86. Akron: 111. Michigan State: 51. Michigan: 68. Ohio State: 182. Iowa: 145. Nebraska: 82. Northwestern: 117. Illinois: 147. Purdue: 112. Minnesota: 100. Penn State: 207
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 24 by 37.4. LSU: 21 by 42.7. Akron: 21 by 55.1. Michigan State: 24 by 23.5. Michigan: 17 by 41.7. Ohio State: 26 by 70.2. Iowa: 37 by 40.3. Nebraska: 19 by 45. Northwestern: 34 by 35. Illinois: 26 by 54.3. Purdue: 27 by 43.2. Minnesota: 26 by 40.1. Penn State: 24 by 84.7
Split Comparison
Wins105 · n=10 · -47.3 vs Losses
Losses152.3 · n=3 · +47.3 vs Wins
First Half106 · n=7 · -21.5 vs Second Half
Second Half127.5 · n=6 · +21.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
84.7 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs Western Michigan | W 24-16 | 22 | 71 | 3.20 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 4.1 |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Penn State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 31-38 | 21 | 164 | 7.80 | 1 | 3 | 43 | 8.6 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Minnesota100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 31-17 | 26 | 100 | 3.80 | 2 | — | — | 3.8 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Purdue100 rush yards | W 49-20 | 27 | 112 | 4.10 | 1 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Illinois100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 48-3 | 25 | 123 | 4.90 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 5.7 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Northwestern100 rush yards | W 21-7 | 32 | 106 | 3.30 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Nebraska | W 23-17 | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Iowa100 rush yards | W 17-9 | 35 | 134 | 3.80 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 3.9 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Ohio State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 23-30 | 25 | 164 | 6.60 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Michigan | L 7-14 | 17 | 68 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Michigan State2+ TD | W 30-6 | 23 | 54 | 2.30 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 2.1 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Akron100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 54-10 | 21 | 111 | 5.30 | 2 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs LSU | W 16-14 | 21 | 86 | 4.10 | 1 | — | — | 4.1 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 556 | 70 | 14.1 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 556 | 70 | 14.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,068 | 56.9 | 19.6 | 512 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,068 | 56.9 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 240 | 45.5 | 23.7 | -828 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 240 | 45.5 | 23.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,507 | 47.2 | 41.4 | 1,267 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,507 | 47.2 | 41.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with 164 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
164
Primary metric
164 scrimmage yards and 24.1 usage.
#2
Penn State
207
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
207 scrimmage yards and 36.9 usage.
#3
Unknown
149
Primary metric
Game with 149 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
149 scrimmage yards and 17.3 usage.
#4
Rutgers
115
Primary metric
Win with 115 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
115 scrimmage yards and 21.6 usage.
#5
Ohio State
182
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
182 scrimmage yards and 41.9 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
1,507 primary output · 47.2 efficiency · 41.4 usage
66.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Wisconsin
66.2
1,507 primary · 47.2 efficiency · 41.4 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Wisconsin
54
1,068 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 19.6 usage
Milestones
17
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9333
Glassboro · Glassboro, NJ
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,371
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.