Player Stats

Xavier Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,874
Rushing yards
2,670
Receiving yards
204
Touchdowns
28

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama00000-
2014 PostseasonSouth Alabama1221210045.3
2014 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama1243041713145.3
2015 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama121,03895682972.2
2016 PostseasonSouth Alabama1244440069.5
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama12873787861269.5
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama846844523648.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

South Alabama paired 1,038 primary output with 57.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 49.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Idaho

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · South Alabama

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

58.5

Efficiency

49.3

Usage

21.2

Consistency

39.9

Best Game by takeover score

Idaho

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 44. Oklahoma State: 36. Alabama A&M: 32. Idaho: 155. Louisiana Tech: 98. Troy: 4. UL Monroe: 99. Georgia State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 13 by 32.9. Oklahoma State: 5 by 75. Alabama A&M: 9 by 37. Idaho: 20 by 80.7. Louisiana Tech: 14 by 75.5. Troy: 7 by 6. UL Monroe: 11 by 87.5. Georgia State: 8 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins45 · Games = 3 · -21.6 vs Losses
Losses66.6 · Games = 5 · +21.6 vs Wins