Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2013-2016Clemson
Jordan Leggett
TE • 6'5" • Navarre, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jordan Leggett reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.5
Consistency
70.1
Season Value
66.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Clemson
13131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Leggett, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Clemson. Jordan Leggett reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Clemson paired 736 primary output with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Clemson
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
56.6
Efficiency
83.5
Usage
12.2
Consistency
70.1
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 95. Ohio State: 4. Troy: 9. Georgia Tech: 31. Louisville: 70. Boston College: 66. NC State: 56. Florida State: 122. Syracuse: 31. Pittsburgh: 95. Wake Forest: 50. South Carolina: 58. Virginia Tech: 49
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 7 by 90.5. Ohio State: 1 by 26.7. Troy: 1 by 60. Georgia Tech: 4 by 51.7. Louisville: 3 by 100. Boston College: 2 by 100. NC State: 5 by 74.7. Florida State: 5 by 100. Syracuse: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 6 by 100. Wake Forest: 3 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 100. Virginia Tech: 4 by 81.7
Split Comparison
Wins53.4 · n=12
First Half47.3 · n=7 · -20.2 vs Second Half
Second Half67.5 · n=6 · +20.2 vs First Half
All Games56.6 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | @ Alabama | W 35-31 | — | 7 | 95 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 1/1 | vs Ohio State | W 31-0 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Virginia Tech2+ TD | W 42-35 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 21 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs South Carolina | W 56-7 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 1 | 30 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Wake Forest | W 35-13 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Pittsburgh | L 42-43 | — | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Syracuse | W 54-0 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Florida State100 receiving yards | W 37-34 | — | 5 | 122 | 24.4 | 24.40 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs NC State | W 24-17 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 10/7 | @ Boston College | W 56-10 | — | 2 | 66 | 33 | 33 | 1 | 56 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Louisville | W 42-36 | — | 3 | 70 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 1 | 31 |
| Thu 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech | W 26-7 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Troy | W 30-24 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Clemson | 176 | 67.8 | 5.8 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Clemson | 176 | 67.8 | 5.8 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Clemson | 161 | 70.2 | 7.4 | -15 |
| 2015 Postseason | Clemson | 525 | 73.2 | 11.6 | 364 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 525 | 73.2 | 11.6 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 736 | 83.5 | 12.2 | 211 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 736 | 83.5 | 12.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101
Primary metric
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida State
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisville
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
44
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Clemson
736 primary output · 83.5 efficiency · 12.2 usage
66.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Clemson
66.4
736 primary · 83.5 efficiency · 12.2 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Clemson
54.4
525 primary · 73.2 efficiency · 11.6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8744
Navarre · Navarre, FL
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,598
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.