Usage Score
21
Player Dossier
2013-2016Michigan
Jake Butt
TE • 6'6" • Pickerington, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jake Butt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.7
Consistency
63.4
Season Value
61.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan
13131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jake Butt, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan. Jake Butt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Michigan paired 654 primary output with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Michigan
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.5
Efficiency
75.7
Usage
21
Consistency
63.4
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 28. Hawai'i: 19. UCF: 86. Colorado: 87. Penn State: 42. Wisconsin: 31. Rutgers: 5. Illinois: 40. Michigan State: 35. Maryland: 76. Iowa: 39. Ohio State: 58
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 3 by 62.2. Hawai'i: 1 by 100. UCF: 7 by 81.9. Colorado: 7 by 82.9. Penn State: 4 by 70. Wisconsin: 3 by 68.9. Rutgers: 1 by 33.3. Illinois: 3 by 88.9. Michigan State: 3 by 77.8. Maryland: 5 by 100. Iowa: 4 by 65. Ohio State: 5 by 77.3
Split Comparison
Wins46.8 · n=9 · +5.1 vs Losses
Losses41.7 · n=3 · -5.1 vs Wins
First Half48.8 · n=6 · +6.7 vs Second Half
Second Half42.2 · n=6 · -6.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Florida State | L 32-33 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Ohio State | L 27-30 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Iowa | L 13-14 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Maryland | W 59-3 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Michigan State | W 32-23 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Illinois | W 41-8 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Rutgers | W 78-0 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Wisconsin | W 14-7 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Penn State | W 49-10 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Colorado | W 45-28 | — | 7 | 87 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UCF2+ TD | W 51-14 | — | 7 | 86 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Hawai'i | W 63-3 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan | 235 | 68.6 | 10.7 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 235 | 68.6 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 211 | 58.5 | 16.8 | -24 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 654 | 73.7 | 18.9 | 443 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 654 | 73.7 | 18.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 546 | 75.7 | 21 | -108 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 546 | 75.7 | 21 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 82.9 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio State
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Maryland
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Michigan
654 primary output · 73.7 efficiency · 18.9 usage
63
#2
2015 Regular Season · Michigan
63
654 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 18.9 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Michigan
61.8
546 primary · 75.7 efficiency · 21 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9288
Pickerington North · Pickerington, OH
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,646
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.