Usage Score
5.7
Player Dossier
2013-2016Michigan
CB • 6'2" • Matthews, NC, USA
Channing Stribling shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.7
Efficiency
26.7
Consistency
42.6
Season Value
34.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Channing Stribling, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan. Channing Stribling shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.7 disruption score.
Channing Stribling played CB for Michigan. Across 4 tracked seasons, Channing Stribling recorded 29 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Michigan paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
26.7
Usage
5.7
Consistency
42.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 1. Hawai'i: 1. UCF: 0. Colorado: 1. Penn State: 2.5. Wisconsin: 4. Illinois: 2. Michigan State: 0.5. Maryland: 1. Iowa: 1. Indiana: 2. Ohio State: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 1 by 14.2. Hawai'i: 2 by 18.3. UCF: 2 by 8.3. Colorado: 3 by 22.5. Penn State: 1 by 29.2. Wisconsin: 2 by 48.3. Illinois: 0 by 20. Michigan State: 5 by 25.8. Maryland: 1 by 14.2. Iowa: 3 by 22.5. Indiana: 5 by 40.8. Ohio State: 4 by 56.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
56.7 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Florida State | L 32-33 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Ohio StateSplash game | L 27-30 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Indiana | W 20-10 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Iowa | L 13-14 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Maryland | W 59-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Michigan State | W 32-23 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Illinois | W 41-8 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs WisconsinSplash game | W 14-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Penn State | W 49-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Colorado | W 45-28 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UCF | W 51-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Hawai'i | W 63-3 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 2 | 20 | — | 2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 20 | 26.7 | 5.7 | 18 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 20 | 26.7 | 5.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
UNLV
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Wisconsin
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.4 takeover score.
#4
Ohio State
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.5 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 31.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Michigan
2 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
42.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Michigan
42.2
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Michigan
34.9
20 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 5.7 usage
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8653
Butler · Matthews, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
29
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.