Usage Score
19.3
Player Dossier
2013-2016Pittsburgh
Scott Orndoff
TE • 6'5" • Waynesburg, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Scott Orndoff reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.5
Consistency
42
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
13141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Scott Orndoff, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Scott Orndoff reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 579 primary output with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
48.3
Efficiency
80.5
Usage
19.3
Consistency
42
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 21. Unknown: 68. Penn State: 15. Oklahoma State: 5. Marshall: 29. Georgia Tech: 86. Virginia: 25. Virginia Tech: 96. Miami: 30. Clemson: 128. Duke: 58. Syracuse: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 2 by 70. Unknown: 5 by 90.7. Penn State: 4 by 25. Oklahoma State: 1 by 33.3. Marshall: 2 by 96.7. Georgia Tech: 2 by 100. Virginia: 3 by 55.6. Virginia Tech: 2 by 100. Miami: 2 by 100. Clemson: 9 by 94.8. Duke: 2 by 100. Syracuse: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins51.3 · n=7 · +13.3 vs Losses
Losses38 · n=4 · -13.3 vs Wins
First Half37.3 · n=6 · -21.8 vs Second Half
Second Half59.2 · n=6 · +21.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Northwestern | L 24-31 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Syracuse | W 76-61 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Duke | W 56-14 | — | 2 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards · High volume | W 43-42 | — | 9 | 128 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 2 | 55 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Miami | L 28-51 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Virginia Tech | L 36-39 | — | 2 | 96 | 48 | 48 | 0 | 71 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Virginia | W 45-31 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Georgia Tech | W 37-34 | — | 2 | 86 | 43 | 43 | 1 | 74 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Marshall | W 43-27 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Oklahoma State | L 38-45 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Penn State | W 42-39 | — | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 3.80 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 50 | 58 | 5.9 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 24 | 40 | 6.8 | -26 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 24 | 40 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 244 | 79.3 | 9.2 | 220 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 244 | 79.3 | 9.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 579 | 80.5 | 19.3 | 335 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 579 | 80.5 | 19.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128
Primary metric
128 receiving yards with a 94.8 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Duke
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
55
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Tech
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
579 primary output · 80.5 efficiency · 19.3 usage
60.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
60.5
579 primary · 80.5 efficiency · 19.3 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Pittsburgh
43.2
244 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 9.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.817
Hamilton · Chandler, AZ
- Committed To
- Nevada
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
897
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.