Usage Score
4.9
Player Dossier
2013-2017Wisconsin
Rachid Ibrahim
RB • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Rockville, MD, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Rachid Ibrahim leans balanced backfield option traits and 50.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
50.8
Consistency
47
Season Value
43.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
131314141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh • Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rachid Ibrahim, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Rachid Ibrahim leans balanced backfield option traits and 50.8 efficiency.
Rachid Ibrahim played RB for Pittsburgh and Wisconsin. Across 5 tracked seasons, Rachid Ibrahim recorded 529 rushing yards, 224 receiving yards, and 14 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Pittsburgh.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Wisconsin.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Win with 51 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
16.1
Efficiency
50.8
Usage
4.9
Consistency
47
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: -3. Utah State: 8. Florida Atlantic: 16. BYU: 27. Nebraska: 51. Purdue: 26. Maryland: 12. Illinois: 26. Indiana: 3. Michigan: 5. Minnesota: 9. Ohio State: 13
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 2 by 6.3. Utah State: 2 by 41.7. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 41.7. BYU: 8 by 35.2. Nebraska: 7 by 75.9. Purdue: 2 by 100. Maryland: 1 by 100. Illinois: 3 by 48.6. Indiana: 1 by 31.3. Michigan: 1 by 52.1. Minnesota: 2 by 31.3. Ohio State: 2 by 45.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16.4 · Games = 11
First Half20.8 · Games = 6 · +9.5 vs Second Half
Second Half11.3 · Games = 6 · -9.5 vs First Half
All Games16.1 · Games = 12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/31 | @ Miami | W 34-24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -4 | -1.5 |
| Sun 12/3 | vs Ohio State | L 21-27 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6.5 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Minnesota | W 31-0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4.5 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Michigan | W 24-10 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Indiana | W 45-17 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Illinois | W 24-10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 8.7 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Maryland | W 38-13 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 0 | — | — | 12 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Purdue | W 17-9 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 26 | 13 |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Nebraska | W 38-17 | 7 | 51 | 7.30 | 0 | — | — | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ BYU | W 40-6 | 8 | 27 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 31-14 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Utah State | W 59-10 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2013-2016
Opening stop
- 2
Wisconsin
2017
Final stop
Season Progression
201320132014201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 224 | 40.6 | 7.1 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 224 | 40.6 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 336 | 56.3 | 6.5 | 112 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 336 | 56.3 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | -336 |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wisconsin | 193 | 50.8 | 4.9 | 193 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 193 | 50.8 | 4.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami
Loss with 88 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
88
Primary metric
88 scrimmage yards and 12.3 usage.
#2
Georgia Tech
75
Primary metric
Loss with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
75 scrimmage yards and 7.5 usage.
#3
Unknown
91
Primary metric
Game with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
91 scrimmage yards and 20.9 usage.
#4
Nebraska
51
Primary metric
Win with 51 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
51 scrimmage yards and 12.1 usage.
#5
Houston
64
Primary metric
Loss with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 11.9 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0 usage
50
#2
2016 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Pittsburgh
47.5
336 primary · 56.3 efficiency · 6.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8194
The Avalon School · Bethesda, MD
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
753
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.