Usage Score
11.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Clemson
Ben Boulware
LB • 6'0" • Anderson, SC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ben Boulware shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46 disruption score.
Efficiency
46
Consistency
24.5
Season Value
24.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Clemson
131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Boulware, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Clemson. Ben Boulware shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Clemson paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Clemson
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
46
Usage
11.1
Consistency
24.5
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 3. Ohio State: 0.5. Auburn: 2. Troy: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Louisville: 5. Boston College: 0. NC State: 0. Florida State: 2. Syracuse: 1. Pittsburgh: 0.5. Wake Forest: 0. South Carolina: 4.5. Virginia Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 6 by 55. Ohio State: 5 by 25.8. Auburn: 6 by 45. Troy: 4 by 16.7. Georgia Tech: 10 by 41.7. Louisville: 18 by 100. Boston College: 9 by 37.5. NC State: 10 by 41.7. Florida State: 6 by 45. Syracuse: 7 by 39.2. Pittsburgh: 12 by 55. Wake Forest: 6 by 25. South Carolina: 7 by 74.2. Virginia Tech: 10 by 41.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=13
First Half1.5 · n=7 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · n=7 · -0.4 vs First Half
All Games1.3 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | @ AlabamaSplash game | W 35-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 1/1 | vs Ohio State | W 31-0 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Virginia Tech10+ tackles | W 42-35 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs South Carolina2+ sacks · Splash game | W 56-7 | 7 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Wake Forest | W 35-13 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Pittsburgh10+ tackles | L 42-43 | 12 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Syracuse | W 54-0 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Florida State | W 37-34 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs NC State10+ tackles | W 24-17 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/7 | @ Boston College | W 56-10 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Louisville10+ tackles · Splash game | W 42-36 | 18 | 8 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech10+ tackles | W 26-7 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Troy | W 30-24 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | @ AuburnSplash game | W 19-13 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Clemson | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Clemson | 1 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Clemson | 2 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 2 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 18.5 | 46 | 11.1 | 16.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 18.5 | 46 | 11.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 73.9 takeover score.
#2
South Carolina
4.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#3
Wake Forest
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Oklahoma
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Oklahoma
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Clemson
2 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Clemson
40.6
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Clemson
40.3
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
6
Impact games
4
Splash games
5
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9229
T.L. Hanna · Anderson, SC
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
116
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.