Usage Score
4.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Clemson
S • 6'0" • Orangeburg, SC, USA
Jadar Johnson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.8
Efficiency
26
Consistency
54.2
Season Value
28.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jadar Johnson, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Clemson. Jadar Johnson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Clemson paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
26
Usage
4.8
Consistency
54.2
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0.5. Ohio State: 0. Auburn: 3. Troy: 1. Unknown: 1. Georgia Tech: 0. Louisville: 2. Boston College: 1. NC State: 1. Florida State: 1. Syracuse: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Wake Forest: 0. South Carolina: 2.5. Virginia Tech: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 7 by 34.2. Ohio State: 4 by 16.7. Auburn: 2 by 38.3. Troy: 5 by 30.8. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Georgia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Louisville: 7 by 49.2. Boston College: 2 by 18.3. NC State: 7 by 39.2. Florida State: 1 by 14.2. Syracuse: 7 by 39.2. Pittsburgh: 3 by 12.5. Wake Forest: 2 by 8.3. South Carolina: 3 by 37.5. Virginia Tech: 6 by 25
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | @ Alabama | W 35-31 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 1/1 | vs Ohio State | W 31-0 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Virginia Tech | W 42-35 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs South CarolinaSplash game | W 56-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Wake Forest | W 35-13 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Pittsburgh | L 42-43 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Syracuse | W 54-0 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Florida State | W 37-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs NC State | W 24-17 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 10/7 | @ Boston College | W 56-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Louisville | W 42-36 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech | W 26-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Troy | W 30-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Auburn | W 19-13 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Clemson | 2 | 20 | — | 2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 2 | 10 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 14 | 26 | 4.8 | 12 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 14 | 26 | 4.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Miami
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Louisville
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 47.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Clemson
2 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
41.3
#2
2016 Postseason · Clemson
28.2
14 primary · 26 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Clemson
28.2
14 primary · 26 efficiency · 4.8 usage
4
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8148
Hamilton · Chandler, AZ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
60
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jadar Johnson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit