Usage Score
30.3
Player Dossier
2013-2016Mississippi State
Fred Ross
WR • 6'2" • Tyler, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Fred Ross reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.9
Consistency
52
Season Value
63.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Mississippi State
13141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Mississippi State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Fred Ross, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Mississippi State. Fred Ross reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 1,007 primary output with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Mississippi State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.5
Efficiency
76.9
Usage
30.3
Consistency
52
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 44. South Alabama: 34. South Carolina: 39. LSU: 89. Massachusetts: 126. Auburn: 29. BYU: 69. Kentucky: 50. Unknown: 107. Texas A&M: 98. Alabama: 23. Arkansas: 171. Ole Miss: 38
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 4 by 73.3. South Alabama: 6 by 37.8. South Carolina: 5 by 52. LSU: 6 by 98.9. Massachusetts: 8 by 100. Auburn: 4 by 48.3. BYU: 5 by 92. Kentucky: 5 by 66.7. Unknown: 9 by 79.3. Texas A&M: 6 by 100. Alabama: 3 by 51.1. Arkansas: 10 by 100. Ole Miss: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins69 · n=5 · +2.6 vs Losses
Losses66.4 · n=7 · -2.6 vs Wins
First Half61.4 · n=7 · -19.7 vs Second Half
Second Half81.2 · n=6 · +19.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/26 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-16 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Ole Miss | W 55-20 | — | 1 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 1 | 38 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards · High volume | L 42-58 | — | 10 | 171 | 17.1 | 17.10 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Alabama | L 3-51 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas A&M2+ TD | W 35-28 | — | 6 | 98 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 2 | 60 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 9 | 107 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kentucky | L 38-40 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ BYU | L 21-28 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Auburn | L 14-38 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Massachusetts100 receiving yards · High volume | W 47-35 | — | 8 | 126 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ LSU | L 20-23 | — | 6 | 89 | 11.7 | 14.80 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs South Carolina | W 27-14 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs South Alabama | L 20-21 | — | 6 | 34 | 11.4 | 5.70 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 115 | 78.2 | 9.6 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Mississippi State | 489 | 79.5 | 12.7 | 374 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 489 | 79.5 | 12.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Mississippi State | 1,007 | 74.7 | 26.1 | 518 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 1,007 | 74.7 | 26.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Mississippi State | 917 | 76.9 | 30.3 | -90 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 917 | 76.9 | 30.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
171
Primary metric
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
154
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
46
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
98
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Mississippi State
1,007 primary output · 74.7 efficiency · 26.1 usage
68.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Mississippi State
68.5
1,007 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 26.1 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Mississippi State
63.1
917 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 30.3 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9216
John Tyler · Tyler, TX
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,528
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.