Usage Score
1.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Mississippi State
Tolando Cleveland
DB • 6'0" • 194 lbs • Powder Springs, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tolando Cleveland shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 10.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
10.5
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
9.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State
131415161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Mississippi State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tolando Cleveland, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Tolando Cleveland shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 10.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 2 primary output with 13.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 10.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Mississippi State
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
10.5
Usage
1.4
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 0. Unknown: 0. LSU: 0. Georgia: 0. BYU: 0. Kentucky: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Alabama: 0. Ole Miss: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. LSU: 2 by 8.3. Georgia: 4 by 16.7. BYU: 1 by 4.2. Kentucky: 1 by 14.2. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Massachusetts: 2 by 8.3. Alabama: 2 by 8.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 28.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.2 · Games = 6 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · +0.5 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · Games = 5 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
28.3 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | vs Louisville | W 31-27 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Ole Miss | L 28-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Alabama | L 24-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Massachusetts | W 34-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Texas A&M | W 35-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Kentucky | W 45-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs BYU | W 35-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Georgia | L 3-31 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs LSU | W 37-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 2 | 13.3 | — | 2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | -2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Mississippi State | 3 | 10.5 | 1.4 | 3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 3 | 10.5 | 1.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
South Alabama
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Ole Miss
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.4 takeover score.
#4
Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 21.6 takeover score.
#5
Georgia
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State
2 primary output · 13.3 efficiency · — usage
30.1
#2
2017 Postseason · Mississippi State
9.1
3 primary · 10.5 efficiency · 1.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Mississippi State
9.1
3 primary · 10.5 efficiency · 1.4 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8056
James Madison · Brooklyn, NY
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
18
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.