Usage Score
14
Player Dossier
2013-2017Central Michigan
WR • 5'11" • 205 lbs • Flint, MI, USA
Eric Cooper reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14
Efficiency
58.6
Consistency
54.3
Season Value
56.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Cooper, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Central Michigan. Eric Cooper reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Eric Cooper played WR for Central Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Eric Cooper recorded 3 rushing yards, 410 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 285 primary output with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
28.5
Efficiency
58.6
Usage
14
Consistency
54.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 25. Kansas: 26. Syracuse: 23. Miami (OH): 81. Boston College: 14. Ohio: 9. Toledo: 37. Ball State: 3. Western Michigan: 9. Northern Illinois: 58
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 4 by 41.7. Kansas: 2 by 86.7. Syracuse: 3 by 51.1. Miami (OH): 6 by 90. Boston College: 2 by 46.7. Ohio: 2 by 30. Toledo: 3 by 82.2. Ball State: 1 by 20. Western Michigan: 1 by 60. Northern Illinois: 5 by 77.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
90 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/22 | @ Wyoming | L 14-37 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Northern Illinois | W 31-24 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 40 |
| Thu 11/2 | @ Western Michigan | W 35-28 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ball State | W 56-9 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Toledo | L 10-30 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Ohio | W 26-23 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Boston College | L 8-28 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Miami (OH) | L 14-31 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Syracuse | L 17-41 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Kansas | W 45-27 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Central Michigan | 84 | 61.1 | 5.9 | 84 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 84 | 61.1 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 41 | 70 | 7.6 | -43 |
| 2017 Postseason | Central Michigan | 285 | 58.6 | 14 | 244 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 285 | 58.6 | 14 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Central Michigan
285 primary output · 58.6 efficiency · 14 usage
56.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · Central Michigan
56.7
285 primary · 58.6 efficiency · 14 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Central Michigan
42.2
84 primary · 61.1 efficiency · 5.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7859
Beecher · Mount Morris, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
410
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.