Usage Score
4.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Tennessee
Malik Foreman
DB • 5'10" • Kingsport, TN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Malik Foreman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.9
Consistency
61.7
Season Value
30.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Tennessee
131414151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Malik Foreman, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Tennessee. Malik Foreman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.9 disruption score.
Malik Foreman played DB for Tennessee. Across 4 tracked seasons, Malik Foreman recorded 26 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Tennessee.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Tennessee paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 22.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
22.9
Usage
4.8
Consistency
61.7
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 1. App State: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 0. Georgia: 1. Texas A&M: 2. Kentucky: 1. Missouri: 0. Vanderbilt: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 3 by 22.5. App State: 3 by 17.5. Virginia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Georgia: 4 by 26.7. Texas A&M: 3 by 32.5. Kentucky: 4 by 26.7. Missouri: 2 by 8.3. Vanderbilt: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 6 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 2 · +1.4 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 4 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 4 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Nebraska | W 38-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | @ VanderbiltSplash game | L 34-45 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Missouri | W 63-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Kentucky | W 49-36 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Texas A&M | L 38-45 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Georgia | W 34-31 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Virginia Tech | W 45-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/1 | vs App State | W 20-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Tennessee | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Tennessee | 0 | 0 | — | -1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Tennessee | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tennessee | 7.5 | 22.9 | 4.8 | 6.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tennessee | 7.5 | 22.9 | 4.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Northwestern
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Vanderbilt
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#4
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.9 takeover score.
#5
Georgia
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 27.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Tennessee
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2014 Regular Season · Tennessee
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Tennessee
41.4
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8067
Casteel · Queen Creek, AZ
- Committed To
- Arizona
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
26
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.