Usage Score
28.5
Player Dossier
2013-2017Central Michigan
Corey Willis
WR • 5'10" • 175 lbs • Holland, MI, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Corey Willis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.9
Consistency
64
Season Value
59.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
1314151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Willis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Central Michigan. Corey Willis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 1,087 primary output with 88.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
74.3
Efficiency
81.9
Usage
28.5
Consistency
64
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 44. Unknown: 43. Kansas: 140. Toledo: 12. Ball State: 98. Western Michigan: 148. Eastern Michigan: 71. Kent State: 75. Northern Illinois: 38
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 3 by 97.8. Unknown: 8 by 35.8. Kansas: 8 by 100. Toledo: 2 by 40. Ball State: 5 by 100. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 78.9. Kent State: 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 84.4
Split Comparison
Wins95 · n=6 · +67 vs Losses
Losses28 · n=2 · -67 vs Wins
First Half67.4 · n=5 · -15.6 vs Second Half
Second Half83 · n=4 · +15.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/22 | @ Wyoming | L 14-37 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 30 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Northern Illinois | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 29 |
| Wed 11/15 | @ Kent State | W 42-23 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 53 |
| Thu 11/9 | vs Eastern Michigan2+ TD | W 42-30 | — | 6 | 71 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 2 | 34 |
| Thu 11/2 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards | W 35-28 | — | 5 | 148 | 29.6 | 29.60 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ball State2+ TD | W 56-9 | — | 5 | 98 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 3 | 63 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Toledo | L 10-30 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Kansas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-27 | — | 8 | 140 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 36 |
| Thu 8/31 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 8 | 43 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 70 | 56.7 | 19.5 | 70 |
| 2015 Postseason | Central Michigan | 564 | 82.2 | 14.9 | 494 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 564 | 82.2 | 14.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Central Michigan | 1,087 | 88.6 | 26.2 | 523 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1,087 | 88.6 | 26.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Central Michigan | 669 | 81.9 | 28.5 | -418 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 669 | 81.9 | 28.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
148
Primary metric
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia
145
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
125
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
1,087 primary output · 88.6 efficiency · 26.2 usage
71.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
71.9
1,087 primary · 88.6 efficiency · 26.2 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Central Michigan
59.7
669 primary · 81.9 efficiency · 28.5 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8041
St. Laurence · Evergreen Park, IL
- Committed To
- Western Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,390
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.