Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2013-2017Central Michigan
Josh Cox
DB • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Warren, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Josh Cox shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
37.5
Consistency
55
Season Value
29.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Central Michigan
13141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Cox, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Josh Cox shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
37.5
Usage
8.7
Consistency
55
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 0. Unknown: 3. Kansas: 1. Syracuse: 1. Miami (OH): 0. Boston College: 0. Ohio: 1.5. Toledo: 0. Ball State: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Eastern Michigan: 2. Kent State: 1. Northern Illinois: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 5 by 20.8. Unknown: 8 by 63.3. Kansas: 4 by 26.7. Syracuse: 7 by 39.2. Miami (OH): 5 by 20.8. Boston College: 4 by 16.7. Ohio: 11 by 60.8. Toledo: 9 by 37.5. Ball State: 7 by 29.2. Western Michigan: 9 by 47.5. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Kent State: 5 by 30.8. Northern Illinois: 10 by 61.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.2 · n=7 · +1.0 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · n=5 · -1.0 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · +0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
63.3 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/22 | @ Wyoming | L 14-37 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Northern Illinois10+ tackles · Splash game | W 31-24 | 10 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/15 | @ Kent State | W 42-23 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 42-30 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/2 | @ Western Michigan | W 35-28 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ball State | W 56-9 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Toledo | L 10-30 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Ohio10+ tackles | W 26-23 | 11 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Boston College | L 8-28 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Miami (OH) | L 14-31 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Syracuse | L 17-41 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Kansas | W 45-27 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Postseason | Central Michigan | 1 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Central Michigan | 10 | 25 | 6.3 | 9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 10 | 25 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Central Michigan | 12.5 | 37.5 | 8.7 | 2.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 12.5 | 37.5 | 8.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.2 takeover score.
#2
Buffalo
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Minnesota
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Northern Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
#5
Northern Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Central Michigan
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.4
#2
2015 Postseason · Central Michigan
40.4
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Central Michigan
29.1
12.5 primary · 37.5 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
3
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7981
De La Salle Collegiate · Warren, MI
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
141
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.