Usage Score
12.9
Player Dossier
2013-2016Stanford
TE • 6'5" • Atlanta, GA, USA
Greg Taboada reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.9
Efficiency
100
Consistency
81.3
Season Value
69.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Greg Taboada, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Stanford. Greg Taboada reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Stanford paired 92 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
30.7
Efficiency
100
Usage
12.9
Consistency
81.3
Best Game by takeover score
California
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 37. Notre Dame: 21. California: 34
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. California: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 136 | 69.4 | 6.8 | 136 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 136 | 69.4 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 66 | 77.5 | 7.6 | -70 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 92 | 100 | 12.9 | 26 |
#1 Featured game
Kansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37
Primary metric
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCLA
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
California
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Washington
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Stanford
92 primary output · 100 efficiency · 12.9 usage
69.3
#2
2014 Postseason · Stanford
57.4
136 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 6.8 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
57.4
136 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 6.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8758
Marist School · Atlanta, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
294
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Greg Taboada quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit