Usage / Role
29%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2015Stanford
TE • 6'4" • San Ramon, CA, USA
Austin Hooper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
29%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
59
Solid production for a tight end
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
55
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Player Story
Austin Hooper built his college career from 2013 through 2015 as a tight end from San Ramon, CA wearing No. 18, spending time with Stanford. The clearest part of Austin Hooper's career was his receiving role: 74...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Austin Hooper, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Stanford. Austin Hooper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 12 | 5 | 71 | 0 | 77.1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 12 | 35 | 428 | 2 | 77.1 |
| 2015 Postseason | Stanford | 12 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 72.7 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 12 | 31 | 415 | 6 | 72.7 |
Related Context
Austin Hooper played TE for Stanford. Across 3 tracked seasons, Austin Hooper recorded 937 receiving yards and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Stanford paired 499 primary output with 79.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
41.6
Efficiency
79.5
Usage
17.6
Consistency
70.2
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 71. UC Davis: 63. USC: 61. Army: 46. Washington: 19. Washington State: 13. Arizona State: 25. Oregon State: 19. Oregon: 62. Utah: 22. California: 47. UCLA: 51
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 5 by 94.7. UC Davis: 4 by 100. USC: 4 by 100. Army: 4 by 76.7. Washington: 3 by 42.2. Washington State: 1 by 86.7. Arizona State: 3 by 55.6. Oregon State: 3 by 42.2. Oregon: 5 by 82.7. Utah: 2 by 73.3. California: 3 by 100. UCLA: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Maryland | W 45-21 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 37 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ UCLA | W 31-10 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ California | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Utah | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Oregon | L 16-45 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oregon State | W 38-14 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/19 | @ Arizona State | L 10-26 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Washington State | W 34-17 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Washington | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Army | W 35-0 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs USC | L 10-13 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UC Davis | W 45-0 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 27 |
Player Story
Austin Hooper built his college career from 2013 through 2015 as a tight end from San Ramon, CA wearing No. 18, spending time with Stanford. The clearest part of Austin Hooper's career was his receiving role: 74 catches, 937 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns across 24 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2015 with Stanford. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. With 24 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Stanford.
The arc is straightforward: Austin Hooper moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 499 | 79.5 | 17.6 | 499 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 499 | 79.5 | 17.6 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Stanford | 438 | 75.5 | 19.5 | -61 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 438 | 75.5 | 19.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Maryland
Week 1 · W 45-21 · Postseason
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Receiving Yards
95.8 takeover
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#2
@ USC
Week 3 · W 41-31 · Conference game
79
Receiving Yards
91.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs UC Davis
Week 1 · W 45-0
63
Receiving Yards
84 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs USC
Week 2 · L 10-13 · Conference game
61
Receiving Yards
82.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs UCLA
Week 7 · W 56-35 · Conference game
42
Receiving Yards
82.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Postseason · Stanford
499 primary output · 79.5 efficiency · 17.6 usage
77.1
#2
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
77.1
499 primary · 79.5 efficiency · 17.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Stanford
72.7
438 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 19.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.