Usage Score
19.5
Player Dossier
2013-2015Stanford
Austin Hooper
TE • 6'4" • San Ramon, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Austin Hooper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.5
Consistency
62.6
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Stanford
1314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Hooper, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Stanford. Austin Hooper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Austin Hooper played TE for Stanford. Across 3 tracked seasons, Austin Hooper recorded 937 receiving yards and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Stanford.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Stanford paired 499 primary output with 79.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Stanford
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
36.5
Efficiency
75.5
Usage
19.5
Consistency
62.6
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 23. Northwestern: 45. UCF: 11. USC: 79. Oregon State: 50. UCLA: 42. Washington: 50. Washington State: 17. Colorado: 62. Oregon: 23. Notre Dame: 27. USC: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 3 by 51.1. Northwestern: 5 by 60. UCF: 1 by 73.3. USC: 4 by 100. Oregon State: 2 by 100. UCLA: 3 by 93.3. Washington: 3 by 100. Washington State: 1 by 100. Colorado: 3 by 100. Oregon: 4 by 38.3. Notre Dame: 3 by 60. USC: 2 by 30
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins37 · Games = 10 · +3 vs Losses
Losses34 · Games = 2 · -3 vs Wins
First Half41.7 · Games = 6 · +10.3 vs Second Half
Second Half31.3 · Games = 6 · -10.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
100 vs Colorado
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Iowa | W 45-16 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs USC | W 41-22 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Notre Dame | W 38-36 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Oregon | L 36-38 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Colorado | W 42-10 | — | 3 | 62 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Washington State | W 30-28 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Washington | W 31-14 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 21 |
| Fri 10/16 | vs UCLA | W 56-35 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Oregon State | W 42-24 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 42 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ USC | W 41-31 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs UCF | W 31-7 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Northwestern | L 6-16 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 499 | 79.5 | 17.6 | 499 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 499 | 79.5 | 17.6 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Stanford | 438 | 75.5 | 19.5 | -61 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 438 | 75.5 | 19.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Maryland
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#2
USC
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
63
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
USC
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Stanford
499 primary output · 79.5 efficiency · 17.6 usage
66.8
#2
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
66.8
499 primary · 79.5 efficiency · 17.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Stanford
64.4
438 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 19.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.881
De La Salle · Concord, CA
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
937
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.