Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 596 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Arizona State | 8 | 8 | 129 | 0 | 37.4 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona State | 11 | 41 | 596 | 6 | 75.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 5 | 11 | 183 | 0 | 48.8 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 3 | 7 | 61 | 1 | 35 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 596 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 54.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona State, Notre Dame.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
20.3
Efficiency
54.1
Usage
13.1
Consistency
32.1
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 10. Georgia: 45. North Carolina: 6
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 3 by 22.2. Georgia: 3 by 100. North Carolina: 1 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.