Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2013-2016USC
Michael Hutchings
ILB • 6'1" • Antioch, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Michael Hutchings shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.1
Consistency
32.1
Season Value
23.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · USC
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Hutchings, ILB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · USC. Michael Hutchings shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
USC paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · USC
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1
Efficiency
31.1
Usage
9
Consistency
32.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 3. Alabama: 4. Utah State: 1. Stanford: 0. Utah: 0. Arizona State: 0.5. Colorado: 1. Arizona: 1. California: 0. Oregon: 0. Washington: 0.5. UCLA: 0. Notre Dame: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 2 by 38.3. Alabama: 5 by 60.8. Utah State: 5 by 30.8. Stanford: 7 by 29.2. Utah: 6 by 25. Arizona State: 4 by 21.7. Colorado: 6 by 35. Arizona: 4 by 26.7. California: 6 by 25. Oregon: 5 by 20.8. Washington: 9 by 42.5. UCLA: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=10 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · n=3 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.4 · n=7 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=6 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Alabama
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Penn StateSplash game | W 52-49 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-27 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCLA | W 36-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Washington | W 26-13 | 9 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Oregon | W 45-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/28 | vs California | W 45-24 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Arizona | W 48-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Colorado | W 21-17 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Arizona State | W 41-20 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Utah | L 27-31 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Stanford | L 10-27 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Utah State | W 45-7 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | @ AlabamaSplash game | L 6-52 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | USC | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2016 Postseason | USC | 13 | 31.1 | 9 | 13 |
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 13 | 31.1 | 9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61 takeover score.
#2
Fresno State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Penn State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#4
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.9 takeover score.
#5
Colorado
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · USC
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.5
#2
2016 Postseason · USC
23.1
13 primary · 31.1 efficiency · 9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · USC
23.1
13 primary · 31.1 efficiency · 9 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9506
De La Salle · Concord, CA
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
66
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.