Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
San José State paired 21 primary output with 31.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | San José State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | San José State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | San José State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | San José State | 12 | 45 | 11 | 7 | 3 | - | 0 | 69.3 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
San José State paired 21 primary output with 31.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 31.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
31.9
Usage
14.5
Consistency
45.2
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 0. Portland State: 0. Utah: 0. Iowa State: 1. New Mexico: 0. Hawai'i: 4. Nevada: 3. San Diego State: 2. UNLV: 2.5. Boise State: 2. Air Force: 0. Fresno State: 6.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 6 by 25. Portland State: 2 by 8.3. Utah: 2 by 8.3. Iowa State: 2 by 18.3. New Mexico: 4 by 16.7. Hawai'i: 2 by 48.3. Nevada: 4 by 46.7. San Diego State: 7 by 49.2. UNLV: 3 by 37.5. Boise State: 6 by 45. Air Force: 1 by 4.2. Fresno State: 6 by 75
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.