Player Stats

Derrick Henry College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,876
Rushing yards
3,591
Receiving yards
285
Touchdowns
45

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 PostseasonAlabama916110061235.2
2013 Regular SeasonAlabama92822820235.2
2014 PostseasonAlabama141499554158.9
2014 Regular SeasonAlabama14974895791258.9
2015 PostseasonAlabama15227233-6583.8
2015 Regular SeasonAlabama152,0831,986972383.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Alabama paired 2,310 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 59.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 93.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Alabama

Games

15

Scrimmage Yards / G

154

Efficiency

59.9

Usage

42.8

Consistency

75.3

Best Game by takeover score

Texas A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112131415

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 158. Michigan State: 69. Wisconsin: 159. Middle Tennessee: 96. Ole Miss: 166. UL Monroe: 52. Georgia: 148. Arkansas: 95. Texas A&M: 254. Tennessee: 143. LSU: 210. Mississippi State: 204. Charleston Southern: 96. Auburn: 271. Florida: 189

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 36 by 45.7. Michigan State: 21 by 37.1. Wisconsin: 15 by 94.2. Middle Tennessee: 18 by 55.6. Ole Miss: 28 by 59.2. UL Monroe: 13 by 41.7. Georgia: 26 by 59.3. Arkansas: 27 by 36.7. Texas A&M: 33 by 78.2. Tennessee: 28 by 53.2. LSU: 38 by 57.6. Mississippi State: 23 by 87. Charleston Southern: 10 by 87.2. Auburn: 46 by 61.4. Florida: 44 by 44.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins153.1 · Games = 14 · -12.9 vs Losses
Losses166 · Games = 1 · +12.9 vs Wins