Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Colorado State paired 21.5 primary output with 33.5 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | Colorado State | 13 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | 0 | 62.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado State | 13 | 55 | 9.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 62.8 |
| 2017 Postseason | Colorado State | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 0 | 73.7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Colorado State | 12 | 42 | 11 | 4.5 | 3 | - | 0 | 73.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Colorado State paired 21.5 primary output with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
33.5
Usage
13.2
Consistency
61.1
Best Game by takeover score
Boise State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 3. Colorado: 2. Oregon State: 3.5. Alabama: 0. Hawai'i: 2. Utah State: 1. Nevada: 0. New Mexico: 2. Air Force: 0. Wyoming: 1. Boise State: 4. San José State: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 3 by 42.5. Colorado: 3 by 32.5. Oregon State: 5 by 55.8. Alabama: 2 by 8.3. Hawai'i: 2 by 28.3. Utah State: 4 by 26.7. Nevada: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico: 3 by 32.5. Air Force: 5 by 20.8. Wyoming: 2 by 18.3. Boise State: 10 by 81.7. San José State: 5 by 50.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.