Usage Score
33.3
Player Dossier
2013-2016Boise State
Thomas Sperbeck
WR • 6'0" • Carmichael, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Thomas Sperbeck reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.2
Consistency
74.9
Season Value
71.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Boise State
1313141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Boise State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Thomas Sperbeck, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Boise State. Thomas Sperbeck reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Boise State paired 1,272 primary output with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Boise State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
97.8
Efficiency
86.2
Usage
33.3
Consistency
74.9
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 79. Louisiana: 130. Washington State: 133. Oregon State: 104. Utah State: 64. New Mexico: 198. Colorado State: 72. BYU: 109. Wyoming: 80. San José State: 19. Hawai'i: 114. UNLV: 47. Air Force: 123
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 8 by 65.8. Louisiana: 6 by 100. Washington State: 7 by 100. Oregon State: 6 by 100. Utah State: 5 by 85.3. New Mexico: 9 by 100. Colorado State: 5 by 96. BYU: 9 by 80.7. Wyoming: 8 by 66.7. San José State: 2 by 63.3. Hawai'i: 5 by 100. UNLV: 5 by 62.7. Air Force: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins99 · n=10 · +5 vs Losses
Losses94 · n=3 · -5 vs Wins
First Half111.4 · n=7 · +29.4 vs Second Half
Second Half82 · n=6 · -29.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ BaylorHigh volume | L 12-31 | — | 8 | 79 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 24 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Air Force100 receiving yards | L 20-27 | — | 5 | 123 | 19.7 | 24.60 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UNLV | W 42-25 | — | 5 | 47 | 8.7 | 9.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Hawai'i100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 52-16 | — | 5 | 114 | 18.7 | 22.80 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs San José State | W 45-31 | — | 2 | 19 | 7 | 9.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ WyomingHigh volume | L 28-30 | — | 8 | 80 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 10/21 | vs BYU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-27 | — | 9 | 109 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Colorado State | W 28-23 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-21 | — | 9 | 198 | 22 | 22 | 2 | 54 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Utah State | W 21-10 | — | 5 | 64 | 11 | 12.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Oregon State100 receiving yards | W 38-24 | — | 6 | 104 | 14.8 | 17.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Washington State100 receiving yards | W 31-28 | — | 7 | 133 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Louisiana100 receiving yards | W 45-10 | — | 6 | 130 | 18.7 | 21.70 | 1 | 43 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boise State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Boise State | 40 | 52.5 | 4.4 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Boise State | 40 | 52.5 | 4.4 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Boise State | 877 | 94.7 | 23.7 | 837 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Boise State | 877 | 94.7 | 23.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Boise State | 1,412 | 84.5 | 25 | 535 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Boise State | 1,412 | 84.5 | 25 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Boise State | 1,272 | 86.2 | 33.3 | -140 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Boise State | 1,272 | 86.2 | 33.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
199
Primary metric
199 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
198
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
198 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
281
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
281 receiving yards with a 93.7 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Air Force
123
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Boise State
1,272 primary output · 86.2 efficiency · 33.3 usage
71.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Boise State
71.1
1,272 primary · 86.2 efficiency · 33.3 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Boise State
66.6
1,412 primary · 84.5 efficiency · 25 usage
Milestones
15
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8161
Jesuit · Carmichael, CA
- Committed To
- Boise State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,601
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.