Player Dossier

2013-2017

Boise State

Jake Roh

TE • 6'3" • 227 lbs • Scottsdale, AZ, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Jake Roh reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

18.9

Efficiency

59.9

Consistency

59.3

Season Value

57.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Boise State

1314141515161617

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Boise State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Jake Roh, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Boise State. Jake Roh reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Jake Roh played TE for Boise State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jake Roh recorded 28 rushing yards, 1,288 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Boise State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

Boise State paired 410 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 59.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · Boise State

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

37.3

Efficiency

59.9

Usage

18.9

Consistency

59.3

Best Game by takeover score

Air Force

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Troy: 14. Washington State: 6. New Mexico: 25. Virginia: 42. BYU: 34. San Diego State: 27. Wyoming: 44. Utah State: 87. Nevada: 67. Colorado State: 62. Air Force: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 2 by 46.7. Washington State: 1 by 40. New Mexico: 3 by 55.6. Virginia: 5 by 56. BYU: 3 by 75.6. San Diego State: 6 by 30. Wyoming: 5 by 58.7. Utah State: 4 by 100. Nevada: 4 by 100. Colorado State: 5 by 82.7. Air Force: 1 by 13.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins40.2 · Games = 9 · +16.2 vs Losses
Losses24 · Games = 2 · -16.2 vs Wins
First Half24.7 · Games = 6 · -27.7 vs Second Half
Second Half52.4 · Games = 5 · +27.7 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Utah State

Best efficiency game

100 vs Nevada

Result
Sun 11/19vs Air ForceW 44-19122.5202
Sun 11/12@ Colorado State2+ TDW 59-5256212.412.40222
Sat 11/4vs NevadaW 41-1446713.816.80125
Sun 10/29@ Utah State2+ TDW 41-1448721.821.80235
Sun 10/22vs WyomingW 24-145448.88.80018
Sun 10/15@ San Diego StateW 31-146274.54.5017
Sat 10/7@ BYUW 24-73348.211.30022
Sat 9/23vs VirginiaL 23-425427.38.40013
Fri 9/15vs New Mexico2+ TDW 28-143257.88.30215
Sun 9/10@ Washington StateL 44-47166606
Sat 9/2vs TroyW 24-132147717

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Boise State

    2013-2017

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20132014201420152015201620162017
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2013 Regular SeasonBoise State0
2014 PostseasonBoise State40865.612.2408
2014 Regular SeasonBoise State40865.612.20
2015 PostseasonBoise State35772.910.3-51
2015 Regular SeasonBoise State35772.910.30
2016 PostseasonBoise State11361.710.5-244
2016 Regular SeasonBoise State11361.710.50
2017 Regular SeasonBoise State41059.918.9297

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Utah State

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

75

Primary metric

75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Utah State

87

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Air Force

58

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.

#4

Air Force

72

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Nevada

67

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2017 Regular Season · Boise State

410 primary output · 59.9 efficiency · 18.9 usage

57.3

#2

2015 Postseason · Boise State

57.1

357 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 10.3 usage

#3

2015 Regular Season · Boise State

57.1

357 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 10.3 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

3

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2013 · Rating 0.8456

Chaparral · Paradise Valley, AZ

Committed To
Boise State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2013

Career Facts

1

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

1,288

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.