Player Stats

Teldrick Morgan College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,951
Receptions
163
Touchdowns
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State0-00-
2014 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State1175903783.6
2015 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State945551467.4
2016 PostseasonMaryland13390166.6
2016 Regular SeasonMaryland1340407566.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

New Mexico State paired 903 primary output with 72.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 64.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across New Mexico State, Maryland.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Maryland

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

38.2

Efficiency

64.3

Usage

24.3

Consistency

65.8

Best Game by takeover score

Boston College

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 90. Howard: 27. Florida International: 38. UCF: 64. Purdue: 46. Penn State: 3. Minnesota: 51. Michigan State: 41. Indiana: 46. Michigan: 26. Ohio State: 56. Nebraska: 9. Rutgers: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 3 by 100. Howard: 3 by 60. Florida International: 3 by 84.4. UCF: 2 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 61.3. Penn State: 2 by 10. Minnesota: 4 by 85. Michigan State: 4 by 68.3. Indiana: 5 by 61.3. Michigan: 3 by 57.8. Ohio State: 7 by 53.3. Nebraska: 2 by 30

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins36 · Games = 6 · -4.1 vs Losses
Losses40.1 · Games = 7 · +4.1 vs Wins