Player Stats

D.J. Taylor College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
286
Receptions
30

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonIllinois115037.5
2014 Regular SeasonIllinois0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonIllinois822216062.8
2016 Regular SeasonIllinois5765044.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Illinois paired 216 primary output with 63.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 57.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Illinois

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

13

Efficiency

57.5

Usage

8.4

Consistency

62.8

Best Game by takeover score

Western Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 24. Purdue: 0. Minnesota: 19. Iowa: 18. Northwestern: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 2 by 80. Minnesota: 2 by 63.3. Iowa: 2 by 60. Northwestern: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half14.3 · Games = 3 · +3.3 vs Second Half
Second Half11 · Games = 2 · -3.3 vs First Half