Usage Score
13.1
Player Dossier
2013-2017Kent State
WR • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Clermont, FL, USA
Kris White reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.1
Efficiency
75.3
Consistency
36.1
Season Value
40.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Kent State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kris White, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Kent State. Kris White reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Kent State paired 270 primary output with 66.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
17.5
Efficiency
75.3
Usage
13.1
Consistency
36.1
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Buffalo: 50. Ohio: 10. Bowling Green: 22. Central Michigan: 11. Akron: 12
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 4 by 83.3. Ohio: 1 by 66.7. Bowling Green: 2 by 73.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 73.3. Akron: 1 by 80
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Buffalo
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kent State
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kent State | 270 | 66.6 | 15.9 | 270 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kent State | 225 | 51.7 | 16.3 | -45 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kent State | 12 | 80 | 7.1 | -213 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kent State | 105 | 75.3 | 13.1 | 93 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#4
Army
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
#5
Penn State
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Kent State
270 primary output · 66.6 efficiency · 15.9 usage
62.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Kent State
47.9
12 primary · 80 efficiency · 7.1 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Kent State
45.2
225 primary · 51.7 efficiency · 16.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7533
South Lake · Groveland, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
612
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kris White quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit