Player Stats

Jack Milas College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
3,025
Passing yards
2,814
Rushing yards
211
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonBall State00000-
2014 Regular SeasonBall State61,3981,302961168.3
2015 Regular SeasonBall State435534312118.1
2016 Regular SeasonBall State126819969152.3
2017 Regular SeasonBall State81,00497034252.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

Ball State paired 1,398 primary output with 58.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 45.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · Ball State

Games

8

Primary Metric / G

125.5

Efficiency

45.8

Usage

14.9

Consistency

58.5

Best Game by takeover score

Western Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UAB: 0. Western Kentucky: 273. Western Michigan: 175. Akron: 183. Central Michigan: 92. Northern Illinois: 61. Buffalo: 130. Miami (OH): 90

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 1 by 33.3. Western Kentucky: 39 by 52.4. Western Michigan: 47 by 46.9. Akron: 50 by 41.4. Central Michigan: 38 by 48.2. Northern Illinois: 19 by 43.9. Buffalo: 29 by 50.2. Miami (OH): 26 by 49.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 1 · -143.4 vs Losses
Losses143.4 · Games = 7 · +143.4 vs Wins