Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2013-2016Arkansas State
DE • 6'3" • Arlington, TX, USA
Chris Odom shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
38.5
Consistency
45
Season Value
38.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Odom, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Arkansas State. Chris Odom shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.5 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 32 primary output with 38.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 38.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.5
Efficiency
38.5
Usage
10.4
Consistency
45
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 0. Toledo: 0. Auburn: 1. Utah State: 5. Unknown: 0. Georgia Southern: 0. South Alabama: 7. UL Monroe: 2. Georgia State: 1. New Mexico State: 3. Troy: 2. Louisiana: 4. Texas State: 7
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 1 by 4.2. Toledo: 5 by 20.8. Auburn: 5 by 30.8. Utah State: 9 by 87.5. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Georgia Southern: 1 by 4.2. South Alabama: 3 by 62.5. UL Monroe: 6 by 45. Georgia State: 2 by 18.3. New Mexico State: 5 by 50.8. Troy: 3 by 32.5. Louisiana: 4 by 56.7. Texas State: 5 by 70.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ UCF | W 31-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Texas State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 36-14 | 5 | 5 | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ LouisianaSplash game | L 19-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/18 | @ Troy | W 35-3 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs New Mexico StateSplash game | W 41-22 | 5 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Georgia State | W 31-16 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-10 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs South Alabama2+ sacks · Splash game | W 17-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/6 | vs Georgia Southern | W 27-26 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Utah State2+ sacks · Splash game | L 20-34 | 9 | 4 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Auburn | L 14-51 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Toledo | L 10-31 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arkansas State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas State | 32 | 38.5 | 10.4 | 32 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 32 | 38.5 | 10.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 62.2 takeover score.
#2
South Alabama
7
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7 disruption/tackle impact with 61.6 takeover score.
#3
Utah State
5
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.2 takeover score.
#4
Louisiana
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 43.1 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
32 primary output · 38.5 efficiency · 10.4 usage
38.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Arkansas State
38.6
32 primary · 38.5 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Arkansas State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
5
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7783
Martin · Arlington, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
53
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chris Odom quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit