Player Stats

Ja'Von Rolland-Jones College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
112
TFL
40
Sacks
26.5
QB hurries
13
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonArkansas State00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonArkansas State10-0--040.8
2016 PostseasonArkansas State134221-078.3
2016 Regular SeasonArkansas State13521911.56-078.3
2017 PostseasonArkansas State1250.501-076
2017 Regular SeasonArkansas State125118.51351076

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Arkansas State paired 41.5 primary output with 48 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 49 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Arkansas State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

3.3

Efficiency

49

Usage

14.2

Consistency

60.9

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 1.5. Nebraska: 0. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 0. SMU: 1.5. Georgia Southern: 5. Coastal Carolina: 3. Louisiana: 7. New Mexico State: 6. South Alabama: 3. Texas State: 5.5. UL Monroe: 2.5. Troy: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 35.8. Nebraska: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 4 by 31.7. Georgia Southern: 6 by 75. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 38.3. Louisiana: 5 by 70.8. New Mexico State: 8 by 83.3. South Alabama: 7 by 59.2. Texas State: 7 by 79.2. UL Monroe: 5 by 45.8. Troy: 3 by 52.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins4.1 · Games = 7 · +2.1 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 5 · -2.1 vs Wins