Usage Score
13.3
Player Dossier
2013-2017LSU
John Diarse
WR • 6'1" • 214 lbs • Monroe, LA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
John Diarse reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.5
Consistency
58.7
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · TCU
131414151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- LSU • TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
John Diarse, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · TCU. John Diarse reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
TCU paired 575 primary output with 85.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across LSU, TCU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · TCU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.2
Efficiency
85.5
Usage
13.3
Consistency
58.7
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 32. Unknown: 20. Arkansas: 36. SMU: 5. Oklahoma State: 40. West Virginia: 70. Kansas State: 41. Kansas: 130. Iowa State: 25. Texas: 37. Oklahoma: 56. Baylor: 17. Oklahoma: 66
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 2 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 66.7. Arkansas: 4 by 60. SMU: 1 by 33.3. Oklahoma State: 3 by 88.9. West Virginia: 4 by 100. Kansas State: 3 by 91.1. Kansas: 4 by 100. Iowa State: 2 by 83.3. Texas: 2 by 100. Oklahoma: 2 by 100. Baylor: 1 by 100. Oklahoma: 5 by 88
Split Comparison
Wins45.3 · n=9 · -3.7 vs Losses
Losses49 · n=3 · +3.7 vs Wins
First Half34.9 · n=7 · -20.3 vs Second Half
Second Half55.2 · n=6 · +20.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Stanford | W 39-37 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 12/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 17-41 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 1 | 15 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Baylor | W 45-22 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Oklahoma | L 20-38 | — | 2 | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Texas | W 24-7 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Iowa State | L 7-14 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/22 | vs Kansas100 receiving yards | W 43-0 | — | 4 | 130 | 32.5 | 32.50 | 1 | 67 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Kansas State | W 26-6 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs West Virginia | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Oklahoma State | W 44-31 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs SMU | W 56-36 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Arkansas | W 28-7 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2013-2015
Opening stop
- 2
TCU
2016-2017
Final stop
Season Progression
201320142014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | LSU | 275 | 81.8 | 18.9 | 275 |
| 2014 Regular Season | LSU | 275 | 81.8 | 18.9 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | LSU | 137 | 69.2 | 14.5 | -138 |
| 2015 Regular Season | LSU | 137 | 69.2 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | TCU | 442 | 71.6 | 11.8 | 305 |
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 442 | 71.6 | 11.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | TCU | 575 | 85.5 | 13.3 | 133 |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 575 | 85.5 | 13.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas
130
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas Tech
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 75 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa State
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 92.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · TCU
575 primary output · 85.5 efficiency · 13.3 usage
64.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · TCU
64.4
575 primary · 85.5 efficiency · 13.3 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · LSU
55.4
275 primary · 81.8 efficiency · 18.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9223
Neville · Monroe, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,429
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.