Usage Score
3.7
Player Dossier
2013-2014LSU
FB • 6'2" • Lake Charles, LA, USA
Melvin Jones leans balanced backfield option traits and 28.3 efficiency.
Usage Score
3.7
Efficiency
28.3
Consistency
49.5
Season Value
44
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · LSU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Melvin Jones, FB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · LSU. Melvin Jones leans balanced backfield option traits and 28.3 efficiency.
Melvin Jones played FB for LSU. Across 2 tracked seasons, Melvin Jones recorded 12 rushing yards, 29 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with LSU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
LSU paired 7 primary output with 58.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 28.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Win with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
8.5
Efficiency
28.3
Usage
3.7
Consistency
49.5
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 3. Florida: 19. Kentucky: 1. Ole Miss: 11
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 1 by 25. Florida: 4 by 39.6. Kentucky: 1 by 10.4. Ole Miss: 3 by 38.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
39.6 vs Florida
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
LSU
2013-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | LSU | 7 | 58.3 | 1.9 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | LSU | 34 | 28.3 | 3.7 | 27 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7
Primary metric
7 scrimmage yards and 1.9 usage.
#2
Florida
19
Primary metric
Win with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
19 scrimmage yards and 6.8 usage.
#3
Ole Miss
11
Primary metric
Win with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 4.8 usage.
#4
New Mexico State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
3 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#5
Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
1 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · LSU
7 primary output · 58.3 efficiency · 1.9 usage
44.9
#2
2014 Regular Season · LSU
44
34 primary · 28.3 efficiency · 3.7 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9065
Washington-Marion · Lake Charles, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
41
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.