Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2013-2016LSU
Tashawn Bower
DE • 6'6" • Somerville, NJ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tashawn Bower shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.2
Consistency
25.4
Season Value
26.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · LSU
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tashawn Bower, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · LSU. Tashawn Bower shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
LSU paired 10.5 primary output with 21.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · LSU
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
21.2
Usage
5.6
Consistency
25.4
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 6. Wisconsin: 0.5. Auburn: 0. Missouri: 0. Southern Miss: 2.5. Ole Miss: 0.5. Arkansas: 1. Florida: 0. Texas A&M: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 4 by 66.7. Wisconsin: 5 by 25.8. Auburn: 1 by 4.2. Missouri: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 2 by 33.3. Ole Miss: 3 by 17.5. Arkansas: 2 by 18.3. Florida: 2 by 8.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=6 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · n=3 · -1.5 vs Wins
First Half1.8 · n=5 · +1.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=4 · -1.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Louisville2+ sacks · Splash game | W 29-9 | 4 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Texas A&M | W 54-39 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida | L 10-16 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Arkansas | W 38-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Ole Miss | W 38-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Southern Miss | W 45-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Missouri | W 42-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Auburn | L 13-18 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-16 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | LSU | 10.5 | 21.2 | 5.6 | 10.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | LSU | 10.5 | 21.2 | 5.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 62.2 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 28.8 takeover score.
#3
Wisconsin
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 13.7 takeover score.
#4
Arkansas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 12.2 takeover score.
#5
Ole Miss
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 10.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · LSU
10.5 primary output · 21.2 efficiency · 5.6 usage
26.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · LSU
26.2
10.5 primary · 21.2 efficiency · 5.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · LSU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9209
Immaculata · Somerville, NJ
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
23
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.