Usage Score
5.4
Player Dossier
2013-2016LSU
Tre'Davious White
CB • 6'0" • Shreveport, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tre'Davious White shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.2
Consistency
49.1
Season Value
35.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · LSU
1313141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre'Davious White, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · LSU. Tre'Davious White shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
LSU paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · LSU
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
29.2
Usage
5.4
Consistency
49.1
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 1. Wisconsin: 2. Unknown: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Auburn: 1. Missouri: 3. Southern Miss: 0. Ole Miss: 2. Alabama: 1.5. Arkansas: 1. Florida: 4. Texas A&M: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 4 by 26.7. Wisconsin: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Mississippi State: 4 by 26.7. Auburn: 2 by 18.3. Missouri: 3 by 42.5. Southern Miss: 5 by 20.8. Ole Miss: 4 by 36.7. Alabama: 3 by 27.5. Arkansas: 0 by 10. Florida: 2 by 48.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 52.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.7 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses2.1 · Games = 4 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · Games = 6 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half2.1 · Games = 6 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Louisville | W 29-9 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Texas A&M | W 54-39 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida | L 10-16 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Arkansas | W 38-10 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Alabama | L 0-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Ole Miss | W 38-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Southern Miss | W 45-10 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Missouri | W 42-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Auburn | L 13-18 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Mississippi State | W 23-20 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-16 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | LSU | 2 | 20 | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | LSU | 2 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | LSU | 2 | 3.3 | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | LSU | 2 | 3.3 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | LSU | 0 | 0 | — | -2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | LSU | 20.5 | 29.2 | 5.4 | 20.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | LSU | 20.5 | 29.2 | 5.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Florida
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
New Mexico State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Texas A&M
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 54.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · LSU
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2015 Regular Season · LSU
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Postseason · LSU
41.9
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9763
Green Oaks · Shreveport, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
35
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.