Player Stats

Mackendy Cheridor College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
41
TFL
10
Sacks
5.5
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonGeorgia State00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonGeorgia State00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonGeorgia State00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonGeorgia State82962.523063.5
2017 PostseasonGeorgia State622211056.9
2017 Regular SeasonGeorgia State6102121056.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season

Georgia State paired 13.5 primary output with 30.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 26.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Georgia State

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

2

Efficiency

26.7

Usage

8.3

Consistency

43.1

Best Game by takeover score

Western Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 6. Tennessee State: 1. Penn State: 0. Charlotte: 2. App State: 1. Idaho: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 2 by 58.3. Tennessee State: 4 by 26.7. Penn State: 2 by 8.3. Charlotte: 1 by 24.2. App State: 0 by 10. Idaho: 3 by 32.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins4 · Games = 2 · +3 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 4 · -3 vs Wins