Usage Score
9.9
Player Dossier
2013-2017UTEP
Devin Cockrell
DB • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Port Arthur, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Devin Cockrell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.4
Consistency
59.3
Season Value
29
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Cockrell, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP. Devin Cockrell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTEP paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 31.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
31.4
Usage
9.9
Consistency
59.3
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 1. Rice: 2. Arizona: 0. New Mexico State: 2. Army: 1. Western Kentucky: 0. Southern Miss: 1. UTSA: 1. North Texas: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1.5. UAB: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 9 by 47.5. Rice: 7 by 49.2. Arizona: 2 by 8.3. New Mexico State: 5 by 40.8. Army: 6 by 35. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 6 by 35. UTSA: 4 by 26.7. North Texas: 8 by 33.3. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 44.2. UAB: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Losses0.9 · n=11
First Half1 · n=6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=5 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games0.9 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ UAB | L 7-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | 7 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ North Texas | L 10-45 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | vs UTSA | L 14-31 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Southern Miss | L 0-24 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | L 14-15 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Army | L 21-35 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | @ New Mexico State | L 14-41 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Arizona | L 16-63 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Rice | L 14-31 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 7-56 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 1 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 23.5 | 4.9 | 4 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 9.5 | 31.4 | 9.9 | 5.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Rice
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Rice
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#4
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.4 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
40.5
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
29
9.5 primary · 31.4 efficiency · 9.9 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7333
Memorial · Port Arthur, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
118
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.