Usage Score
29.9
Player Dossier
2013-2016UTSA
Jarveon Williams
RB • 5'9" • Converse, TX, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Jarveon Williams leans workhorse runner traits and 46.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
46.5
Consistency
76.5
Season Value
63.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jarveon Williams, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA. Jarveon Williams leans workhorse runner traits and 46.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UTSA paired 1,121 primary output with 46.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 46.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Loss with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · UTSA
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
86.2
Efficiency
46.5
Usage
29.9
Consistency
76.5
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 134. Unknown: 29. Colorado State: 38. Arizona State: 80. Old Dominion: 93. Southern Miss: 129. Rice: 45. UTEP: 111. North Texas: 74. Middle Tennessee: 129. Louisiana Tech: 98. Texas A&M: 59. Charlotte: 102
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 17 by 81.7. Unknown: 7 by 47.5. Colorado State: 9 by 25.4. Arizona State: 15 by 22.2. Old Dominion: 21 by 46.1. Southern Miss: 16 by 83.6. Rice: 14 by 32.6. UTEP: 23 by 51.1. North Texas: 18 by 42.8. Middle Tennessee: 22 by 56.9. Louisiana Tech: 20 by 53.4. Texas A&M: 22 by 26.7. Charlotte: 22 by 35.1
Split Comparison
Wins95.8 · n=5 · +8.2 vs Losses
Losses87.6 · n=7 · -8.2 vs Wins
First Half78.3 · n=7 · -17.2 vs Second Half
Second Half95.5 · n=6 · +17.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
83.6 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs New Mexico100 rush yards | L 20-23 | 16 | 125 | 7.80 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 7.9 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Charlotte | W 33-14 | 19 | 48 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 | 54 | 4.6 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-23 | 21 | 52 | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2.7 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Louisiana Tech2+ TD | L 35-63 | 18 | 95 | 5.30 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4.9 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Middle Tennessee100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 45-25 | 21 | 109 | 5.20 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs North Texas | W 31-17 | 18 | 74 | 4.10 | 0 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs UTEP100 rush yards | L 49-52 | 21 | 104 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Rice | W 14-13 | 13 | 40 | 3.10 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3.2 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Southern Miss100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 55-32 | 15 | 122 | 8.10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8.1 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Old Dominion | L 19-33 | 21 | 93 | 4.40 | 1 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Arizona State | L 28-32 | 10 | -1 | -0.10 | 0 | 5 | 81 | 5.3 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado State | L 14-23 | 8 | 10 | 1.30 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 4.2 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 29 | 4.80 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.1 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 260 | 51 | 7.2 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 449 | 47.5 | 18.6 | 189 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,102 | 59.5 | 28.4 | 653 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 1,121 | 46.5 | 29.9 | 19 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,121 | 46.5 | 29.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Loss with 157 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
157
Primary metric
157 scrimmage yards and 22 usage.
#2
Colorado State
170
Primary metric
Loss with 170 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
170 scrimmage yards and 30.2 usage.
#3
Charlotte
186
Primary metric
Win with 186 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
186 scrimmage yards and 29.7 usage.
#4
New Mexico
134
Primary metric
Loss with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134 scrimmage yards and 35.4 usage.
#5
Southern Miss
129
Primary metric
Win with 129 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
129 scrimmage yards and 35.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · UTSA
1,121 primary output · 46.5 efficiency · 29.9 usage
63.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
63.2
1,121 primary · 46.5 efficiency · 29.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
62
1,102 primary · 59.5 efficiency · 28.4 usage
Milestones
11
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7893
Judson · Converse, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,932
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.