Player Stats

Trent Taylor College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
4,179
Receptions
327
Touchdowns
32

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech1028260246.2
2014 PostseasonLouisiana Tech14220068.9
2014 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech1462814968.9
2015 PostseasonLouisiana Tech1310149180.9
2015 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech13891,133880.9
2016 PostseasonLouisiana Tech1412233289
2016 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech141241,5701089

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Louisiana Tech paired 1,803 primary output with 79.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 79.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Navy

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

128.8

Efficiency

79.1

Usage

37.9

Consistency

77

Best Game by takeover score

Navy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Navy: 233. Arkansas: 78. South Carolina State: 178. Texas Tech: 166. Middle Tennessee: 210. UTEP: 121. Western Kentucky: 108. Massachusetts: 126. Florida International: 156. Rice: 131. North Texas: 44. UTSA: 25. Southern Miss: 119. Western Kentucky: 108

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 12 by 100. Arkansas: 8 by 65. South Carolina State: 11 by 100. Texas Tech: 7 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 17 by 82.4. UTEP: 10 by 80.7. Western Kentucky: 13 by 55.4. Massachusetts: 9 by 93.3. Florida International: 11 by 94.5. Rice: 7 by 100. North Texas: 5 by 58.7. UTSA: 5 by 33.3. Southern Miss: 10 by 79.3. Western Kentucky: 11 by 65.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins124.7 · Games = 9 · -11.5 vs Losses
Losses136.2 · Games = 5 · +11.5 vs Wins