Player Stats

Carlos Henderson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,878
Receptions
147
Touchdowns
36

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech0-00-
2014 PostseasonLouisiana Tech12493056.9
2014 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech1225476656.9
2015 PostseasonLouisiana Tech11153065.7
2015 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech1135721565.7
2016 PostseasonLouisiana Tech1310129279.6
2016 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech13721,4062379.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Louisiana Tech paired 1,535 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

118.1

Efficiency

85.2

Usage

25.3

Consistency

48.9

Best Game by takeover score

Massachusetts

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Navy: 129. Arkansas: 71. South Carolina State: 38. Texas Tech: 130. Middle Tennessee: 87. Western Kentucky: 232. Massachusetts: 326. Florida International: 68. Rice: 83. North Texas: 133. UTSA: 11. Southern Miss: 25. Western Kentucky: 202

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 10 by 86. Arkansas: 6 by 78.9. South Carolina State: 5 by 50.7. Texas Tech: 9 by 96.3. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 100. Western Kentucky: 8 by 100. Massachusetts: 12 by 100. Florida International: 6 by 75.6. Rice: 3 by 100. North Texas: 8 by 100. UTSA: 2 by 36.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 83.3. Western Kentucky: 9 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins127.5 · Games = 8 · +24.5 vs Losses
Losses103 · Games = 5 · -24.5 vs Wins