Usage Score
25.3
Player Dossier
2013-2016Louisiana Tech
WR • 5'11" • New Orleans, LA, USA
Carlos Henderson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.3
Efficiency
85.2
Consistency
48.9
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carlos Henderson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech. Carlos Henderson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 1,535 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
118.1
Efficiency
85.2
Usage
25.3
Consistency
48.9
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 129. Arkansas: 71. Unknown: 38. Texas Tech: 130. Middle Tennessee: 87. Western Kentucky: 232. Massachusetts: 326. Florida International: 68. Rice: 83. North Texas: 133. UTSA: 11. Southern Miss: 25. Western Kentucky: 202
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 10 by 86. Arkansas: 6 by 78.9. Unknown: 5 by 50.7. Texas Tech: 9 by 96.3. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 100. Western Kentucky: 8 by 100. Massachusetts: 12 by 100. Florida International: 6 by 75.6. Rice: 3 by 100. North Texas: 8 by 100. UTSA: 2 by 36.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 83.3. Western Kentucky: 9 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | @ Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-45 | — | 10 | 129 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Western Kentucky100 receiving yards · High volume | L 44-58 | — | 9 | 202 | 20 | 22.40 | 1 | 74 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Southern Miss | L 24-39 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs UTSA | W 63-35 | — | 2 | 11 | 6.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ North Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-24 | — | 8 | 133 | 16.1 | 16.60 | 4 | 52 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Rice | W 61-16 | — | 3 | 83 | 24.8 | 27.70 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Florida International | W 44-24 | — | 6 | 68 | 14 | 11.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Massachusetts100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-28 | — | 12 | 326 | 27.2 | 27.20 | 5 | 83 |
| Fri 10/7 | vs Western Kentucky100 receiving yards · High volume | W 55-52 | — | 8 | 232 | 25.7 | 29 | 3 | 63 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 34-38 | — | 2 | 87 | 30 | 43.50 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Texas Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 45-59 | — | 9 | 130 | 14.1 | 14.40 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 38 | 8.3 | 7.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas | L 20-21 | — | 6 | 71 | 10 | 11.80 | 0 | 24 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisiana Tech
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 569 | 79.9 | 16 | 569 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 569 | 79.9 | 16 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 774 | 96.1 | 16.7 | 205 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 774 | 96.1 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 1,535 | 85.2 | 25.3 | 761 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1,535 | 85.2 | 25.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
326
Primary metric
326 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
North Texas
162
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Illinois
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
1,535 primary output · 85.2 efficiency · 25.3 usage
64.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
64.4
1,535 primary · 85.2 efficiency · 25.3 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
55.7
774 primary · 96.1 efficiency · 16.7 usage
10
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8236
McDonogh 35 · New Orleans, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,878
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Carlos Henderson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit