Player Stats

Kai De La Cruz College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
574
Receptions
41
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonLouisville615271366.6
2014 PostseasonLouisville1119066.1
2014 Regular SeasonLouisville1125294266.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Louisville paired 271 primary output with 89.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 61.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Louisville

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

27.5

Efficiency

61.2

Usage

13.1

Consistency

59.5

Best Game by takeover score

Notre Dame

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 9. Miami: 10. Murray State: 53. Virginia: 41. Wake Forest: 28. Clemson: 7. NC State: 3. Florida State: 38. Boston College: 9. Notre Dame: 70. Kentucky: 35

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 1 by 60. Miami: 2 by 33.3. Murray State: 4 by 88.3. Virginia: 3 by 91.1. Wake Forest: 3 by 62.2. Clemson: 1 by 46.7. NC State: 1 by 20. Florida State: 4 by 63.3. Boston College: 2 by 30. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. Kentucky: 3 by 77.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins29.7 · Games = 7 · +6.0 vs Losses
Losses23.8 · Games = 4 · -6.0 vs Wins