Player Stats

James Quick College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,032
Receptions
126
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 PostseasonLouisville6113032.7
2013 Regular SeasonLouisville6560032.7
2014 PostseasonLouisville12257064.3
2014 Regular SeasonLouisville1234509364.3
2015 PostseasonLouisville10473077.4
2015 Regular SeasonLouisville1035551577.4
2016 PostseasonLouisville12381080.9
2016 Regular SeasonLouisville1242688680.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Louisville paired 769 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Louisville

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

64.1

Efficiency

82.5

Usage

22

Consistency

67.5

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 81. Charlotte: 32. Syracuse: 108. Florida State: 122. Marshall: 98. Clemson: 83. Duke: 37. NC State: 43. Boston College: 78. Wake Forest: 7. Houston: 13. Kentucky: 67

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 3 by 100. Charlotte: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Florida State: 7 by 100. Marshall: 4 by 100. Clemson: 7 by 79. Duke: 5 by 49.3. NC State: 4 by 71.7. Boston College: 3 by 100. Wake Forest: 1 by 46.7. Houston: 2 by 43.3. Kentucky: 4 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins65.6 · Games = 8 · +4.6 vs Losses
Losses61 · Games = 4 · -4.6 vs Wins