Usage Score
6.6
Player Dossier
2013-2017Houston
DE • 6'4" • 293 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Nick Thurman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.6
Efficiency
18.9
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
15.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Thurman, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston. Nick Thurman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.9 disruption score.
Nick Thurman played DE for Houston. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nick Thurman recorded 59 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Houston.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Houston paired 10.5 primary output with 21.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
18.9
Usage
6.6
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 0. Arizona: 1. Rice: 0. Texas Tech: 2. Temple: 0. SMU: 0. Tulsa: 3. Memphis: 0.5. South Florida: 0. Tulane: 0. Navy: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 3 by 12.5. Arizona: 1 by 14.2. Rice: 2 by 8.3. Texas Tech: 3 by 32.5. Temple: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 4 by 16.7. Tulsa: 4 by 46.7. Memphis: 2 by 13.3. South Florida: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 6 by 25. Navy: 3 by 22.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/25 | vs Fresno State | L 27-33 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Navy | W 24-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Tulane | L 17-20 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ South Florida | W 28-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/20 | vs Memphis | L 38-42 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tulsa | L 17-45 | 4 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs SMU | W 35-22 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Temple | W 20-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Texas Tech | L 24-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Rice | W 38-3 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ Arizona | W 19-16 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Houston | 10.5 | 21.8 | 4.8 | 10.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 10.5 | 21.8 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Houston | 7.5 | 18.9 | 6.6 | -3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 7.5 | 18.9 | 6.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#2
Louisville
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
#3
Tulane
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 47.8 takeover score.
#4
UCF
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 43.9 takeover score.
#5
Texas Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Houston
10.5 primary output · 21.8 efficiency · 4.8 usage
25.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Houston
25.5
10.5 primary · 21.8 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Houston
15.7
7.5 primary · 18.9 efficiency · 6.6 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8183
Lake Highlands · Dallas, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
59
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.