Usage Score
11.7
Player Dossier
2013-2016Cincinnati
Zach Edwards
S • 6'1" • Middletown, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Zach Edwards shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 49.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
49.8
Consistency
55.9
Season Value
32.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Cincinnati
1314141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zach Edwards, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Zach Edwards shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 49.8 disruption score.
Zach Edwards played S for Cincinnati. Across 4 tracked seasons, Zach Edwards recorded 93 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Cincinnati.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 49.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
49.8
Usage
11.7
Consistency
55.9
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1. Purdue: 0. South Florida: 0. UConn: 2. East Carolina: 1. Temple: 1. BYU: 1.5. UCF: 1.5. Memphis: 3.5. Tulsa: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 12 by 60. Purdue: 2 by 8.3. South Florida: 8 by 33.3. UConn: 9 by 57.5. East Carolina: 13 by 60. Temple: 9 by 47.5. BYU: 8 by 48.3. UCF: 12 by 65. Memphis: 11 by 80.8. Tulsa: 9 by 37.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · Games = 7 · +0.9 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · Games = 5 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
80.8 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Tulsa | L 37-40 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Memphis10+ tackles | L 7-34 | 11 | 7 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ UCF10+ tackles | L 3-24 | 12 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs BYU | L 3-20 | 8 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Temple | L 13-34 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs East Carolina10+ tackles | W 31-19 | 13 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UConn | L 9-20 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs South Florida | L 20-45 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Purdue | W 38-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown10+ tackles | — | 12 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 2 | 20 | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Cincinnati | 2 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 2 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 3 | 15 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 11.5 | 49.8 | 11.7 | 8.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.5 takeover score.
#2
Temple
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Virginia Tech
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Miami (OH)
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Cincinnati
2 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.7
#2
2014 Postseason · Cincinnati
40.7
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Cincinnati
40.7
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
8
Impact games
0
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.82
Middletown · Middletown, OH
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
93
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.