Usage Score
10.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016TCU
Denzel Johnson
S • 6'2" • Gainesville, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Denzel Johnson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 48.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
48.4
Consistency
46.3
Season Value
32.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · TCU
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Denzel Johnson, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · TCU. Denzel Johnson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 48.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
TCU paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 48.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · TCU
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
48.4
Usage
10.8
Consistency
46.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 3. Arkansas: 1. Iowa State: 1. SMU: 1. Oklahoma: 3. Kansas: 3.5. West Virginia: 1. Texas Tech: 1. Baylor: 3. Oklahoma State: 2. Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 50.8. Arkansas: 5 by 30.8. Iowa State: 9 by 47.5. SMU: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma: 8 by 63.3. Kansas: 11 by 80.8. West Virginia: 7 by 39.2. Texas Tech: 9 by 47.5. Baylor: 6 by 55. Oklahoma State: 15 by 70. Texas: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · n=5 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half2.1 · n=6 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=5 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
80.8 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Texas | W 31-9 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Oklahoma State10+ tackles · Splash game | L 6-31 | 15 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Baylor | W 62-22 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Texas Tech | L 24-27 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ West Virginia | L 10-34 | 7 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Kansas10+ tackles · Splash game | W 24-23 | 11 | 9 | — | 3.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs OklahomaSplash game | L 46-52 | 8 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ SMU | W 33-3 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Iowa State | W 41-20 | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Arkansas | L 38-41 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | TCU | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 19.5 | 48.4 | 10.8 | 18.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 65.6 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.5 takeover score.
#4
Baylor
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#5
Oklahoma State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · TCU
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · TCU
32.1
19.5 primary · 48.4 efficiency · 10.8 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · TCU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7926
Gainesville · Gainesville, TX
- Committed To
- TCU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
84
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.