Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2013-2017TCU
CB • 5'10" • 170 lbs • Frisco, TX, USA
Ranthony Texada shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
23.7
Consistency
35.7
Season Value
26.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ranthony Texada, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · TCU. Ranthony Texada shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.7 disruption score.
Ranthony Texada played CB for TCU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Ranthony Texada recorded 79 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with TCU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
TCU paired 13.5 primary output with 25.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 23.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
23.7
Usage
5.2
Consistency
35.7
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 1. Unknown: 2. Arkansas: 1. SMU: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. West Virginia: 4. Kansas State: 1. Kansas: 0. Iowa State: 4. Texas: 2. Texas Tech: 0. Baylor: 1. Oklahoma: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 6 by 35. Unknown: 2 by 28.3. Arkansas: 2 by 18.3. SMU: 1 by 14.2. Oklahoma State: 4 by 16.7. West Virginia: 5 by 60.8. Kansas State: 4 by 26.7. Kansas: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 3 by 52.5. Texas: 3 by 32.5. Texas Tech: 0 by 0. Baylor: 1 by 14.2. Oklahoma: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Stanford | W 39-37 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 17-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Baylor | W 45-22 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Texas Tech | W 27-3 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Texas | W 24-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Iowa State | L 7-14 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sun 10/22 | vs Kansas | W 43-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Kansas State | W 26-6 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs West Virginia | W 31-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Oklahoma State | W 44-31 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs SMU | W 56-36 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Arkansas | W 28-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | TCU | 1 | 6.7 | — | 1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | TCU | 1 | 6.7 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2016 Postseason | TCU | 13.5 | 25.1 | 5.9 | 13.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 13.5 | 25.1 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | TCU | 17 | 23.7 | 5.2 | 3.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 17 | 23.7 | 5.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.4 takeover score.
#2
Iowa State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Texas
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#4
Iowa State
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#5
West Virginia
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 32.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · TCU
13.5 primary output · 25.1 efficiency · 5.9 usage
28.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · TCU
28.9
13.5 primary · 25.1 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · TCU
26.3
17 primary · 23.7 efficiency · 5.2 usage
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8522
Centennial · Frisco, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
79
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.