Usage Score
15.5
Player Dossier
2013-2017Kansas
Ben Johnson
TE • 6'5" • 245 lbs • Basehor, KS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ben Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.6
Consistency
48.7
Season Value
58.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Kansas
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Kansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Johnson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Kansas. Ben Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ben Johnson played TE for Kansas. Across 5 tracked seasons, Ben Johnson recorded 670 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Kansas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Kansas paired 363 primary output with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Kansas
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
33
Efficiency
70.6
Usage
15.5
Consistency
48.7
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 90. Central Michigan: 57. Ohio: 25. West Virginia: 23. Texas Tech: 55. TCU: 35. Kansas State: 17. Baylor: 5. Texas: 36. Oklahoma: 20. Oklahoma State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 7 by 54.3. Ohio: 2 by 83.3. West Virginia: 1 by 100. Texas Tech: 5 by 73.3. TCU: 4 by 58.3. Kansas State: 2 by 56.7. Baylor: 1 by 33.3. Texas: 3 by 80. Oklahoma: 2 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses27.3 · Games = 10
First Half47.5 · Games = 6 · +31.9 vs Second Half
Second Half15.6 · Games = 5 · -31.9 vs First Half
All Games33 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ Oklahoma State | L 17-58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Oklahoma | L 3-41 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Texas | L 27-42 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Baylor | L 9-38 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Kansas State | L 20-30 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/22 | @ TCU | L 0-43 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Texas Tech | L 19-65 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs West Virginia | L 34-56 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Ohio | L 30-42 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Central Michigan | L 27-45 | — | 7 | 57 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 90 | 30 | 30 | 1 | 57 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Kansas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kansas | 80 | 68.7 | 8.5 | 80 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kansas | 115 | 54.6 | 7.6 | 35 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kansas | 112 | 44.4 | 7 | -3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kansas | 363 | 70.6 | 15.5 | 251 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86
Primary metric
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
90
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
TCU
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas Tech
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
West Virginia
17
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Kansas
363 primary output · 70.6 efficiency · 15.5 usage
58.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Kansas
43.3
80 primary · 68.7 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Kansas
41.2
115 primary · 54.6 efficiency · 7.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8033
Helena · Helena, AL
- Committed To
- Georgia Southern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
670
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.